The Gulf Buys Big Into Paramount. What It Wants in ReturnSaudi Arabia, Qatar and UAE sovereign funds will own 22% after the merger and potential influence to match
I’ve written about the feels among former JFK Jr.’s George magazine staffers about FX’s Love Story, why Wall Street soured on Paramount-WBD and shrinking TV news salaries at CBS under Bari Weiss. I also write The Media Mix newsletter.
Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates rarely agree on anything. Now their sovereign wealth funds are jointly pouring almost $24 billion into Paramount Skydance’s $111 billion deal to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, joining Larry Ellison in backing son David Ellison’s pitch to transform Hollywood by absorbing (and thus subtracting) one of its iconic studios. The question is what the Gulf states want from a deal that will put two Hollywood studios and two global news networks — CNN and CBS — under one roof. Foreign investment in U.S. media isn’t new. But it has rarely collided this directly with major American news assets — or come this close to federal limits. The FCC caps foreign ownership of broadcast TV at 25 percent; the three funds are approaching that threshold at 21.6 percent. The war with Iran has laid bare the limits of press freedom in the Gulf states, where journalists who question official policies and propaganda are frequently subject to arrest, and criticism of the state can lead to the death penalty. The current U.S. administration, which has close ties to the Gulf states, does not seem likely to be bothered by this group of investors’ participation. The Saudi royal family has invested $2 billion in Jared Kushner’s private equity firm, Affinity Partners, while the Qatari government controversially gave President Trump a free plane (valued at roughly $400 million) to supplement Air Force One. But last month, a group of Senate Democrats wrote to FCC chair Brendan Carr, seeking a serious review of the Paramount-WBD merger deal involving three nations whose policies have at times been hostile to the U.S. and that have infamously bad human rights records. The 2018 murder of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi looms particularly large over the potential deal, since U.S. intelligence agencies concluded it was ordered by Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Arabia’s crown prince and de facto ruler — and chairman of his country’s Public Investment Fund (PIF). Nineteen journalists are currently detained in Saudi Arabia, according to Reporters Without Borders, whose World Press Freedom Index ranks the nation 166 out of 180 countries. “Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates are not adversaries, but they are foreign governments with distinct and sometimes conflicting interests from those of the United States,” the letter to the FCC chair read. “Even as non-governing partners, their massive investment creates significant opportunity to obtain data and information about Americans and their viewing habits, and soft power and influence over CNN’s editorial decisions and business priorities.” Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, the Qatar Investment Authority and the UAE’s L’imad Holding Co. won’t have voting control or board seats. But in Hollywood, influence doesn’t necessarily require either — and the real question is what governments trying to build global media power actually expect in return. From my conversations with investors, attorneys and other experts, it turns out, quite a bit. I’ll take you into the specific needs and wants from each of the three sovereign funds, including around news, and how those expectations already are taking shape. Subscribe to The Ankler to unlock the rest.Become a paying subscriber of The Ankler to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content. A subscription gets you:
|
